Procedures
So you can best target any potential biases due to attrition into the longitudinal analyses, full imputation restriction chances (FIML) measures were used having analyses, plus all of the details that have been associated with upcoming lost study (i.age., where study just weren’t shed completely randomly). Since these steps have been found to produce the least biased rates whenever all the readily available analysis are used for longitudinal analyses (against. listwise deletion from shed study), the entire brand new shot off 185 with the large studies is actually useful for these analyses. It larger test for this reason contains the absolute best prices from growth and alter when you look at the externalizing decisions and you can depressive symptoms and you can are minimum more likely biased of the missing analysis. age., listwise deletion) produced results that have been dramatically identical to people stated less than. When you look at the sum, analyses recommend that attrition is actually modest complete rather than going to features distorted any of the findings stated. Analyses together with showed that users to have which telecommunications data having fathers was indeed offered had highest loved ones revenues, was in fact less likely to be members of a racial/ethnic fraction classification, and you can was prone to feel properly affixed than simply participants to possess which father interaction analysis just weren’t available.
Mature accessory interview (AAI) and you may Q-place (George, Kaplan, & Main, 1996; Kobak mais aussi al., 1993)
This prepared interviews probes individuals’ descriptions of its young people matchmaking with moms and dads both in abstract conditions along with wants specific help memories. For example, subjects was asked in order to listing four conditions discussing its very early childhood matchmaking with each father or mother then to spell it out particular symptoms one to mirrored those individuals terms and conditions. Other inquiries focused abreast of specific instances of upset, separation, loss, trauma, and you may rejection. In the long run, the brand new interviewer questioned players to include a whole lot more integrative definitions away from alter from inside the dating having mothers and the current state of them dating. This new interviews contains 18 issues and lasted an hour or so with the mediocre. Limited adjustment toward adult version were made to make the questions natural and easily realized to own a teenager inhabitants (Ward & Carlson, 1995). Interview had been audiotaped and you will transcribed having programming.
The fresh AAI Q-put (Kobak ainsi que al., 1993) was designed to closely synchronous the brand new Adult Attachment Interview Group System (Fundamental & Goldwyn, 1998) however, to produce proceeded strategies regarding qualities off connection providers. For each and every rater realize good transcript and you may provided good Q-type dysfunction by assigning a hundred items toward nine kinds between very so you’re able to the very least attribute of one’s interview, having fun with a pressured delivery. Every interview was indeed blindly ranked by the about one or two raters which have thorough learning both Q-types additionally the Adult Attachment Interviews Category Program.
These Q-sorts were then compared with a dimensional prototype sort for secure versus anxious interview strategies, reflecting the overall degree of coherence of discourse, the integration of episodic and semantic attachment memories, and a clear objective valuing of attachment. The individual correlation of the 100 items of an individual’s Q-sort with a prototype sort for a maximally secure transcript was then used as that participant’s scale security score (ranging from ?1.00 to 1.00). The sites de rencontres pour célibataires actifs Spearman-Brown interrater reliability for the final security scale score was.82. This system was designed to yield continuous measures of qualities of attachment organization rather than to replicate classifications from the Main and Goldwyn (1998) system. Prior work has compared the scores obtained within this lab to a subsample (N = 76) of adolescent AAIs that were classified by an independent coder with well-established reliability in classifying AAIs (U. Wartner) We did this by converting the Q-sort scales described above into classifications using an algorithm described by Kobak et al. (1993). Using this approach, we obtained an 84% match for security versus insecurity between the Q-sort method and the classification method (K = .68). Prior research in adolescent samples has also indicated that security is highly stable over a two-year period (i.e., r = .61) (Allen, McElhaney, Kuperminc, & Jodl, 2004). We also considered employing a category available for coding adolescents’ use of hyperactivating versus deactivating strategies in the interview, but given that its high inverse correlation with attachment security (r = .78, p < .0001) suggested it would be supplying largely redundant information, it was not analyzed further.